Join to share your radiology knowledge with others!
Carcinoma BreastClinical History: A 35 year old female presented with a lump in the right breast. Findings: Figure 1. Mammography image shows dense ill defined opacity in the right breast. Figure 2. Ultrasound image shows a irregular hypoechoic lesion in the right breast. Diagnosis: Carcinima Right Breast Discussion:
In addition to the architectural information, there are features related to the time course of enhancement that are predictive of cancer.The most robust and reproducible features relate to the qualitative assessment of the enhancement curve. The enhancement curve is not measured as the average enhancement curve over the lesion. Rather, the enhancement curve should be sampled from multiple locations in the lesion, and the most suspicious enhancement curve in the lesion should be assigned to the lesion. Enhancement curves can be divided into three major types: persistent, plateau, and washout. Persistent enhancing curves demonstrate continued enhancement beyond the first 2 minutes of acquisition. Plateau curves will plateau and level off after 2 minutes of contrast injection. Washout curves will reach a peak after 2 minutes of contrast injection and new signal intensity area may be seen in addtion to already diagnosed malignant area. Washout is felt to be a feature suspicious for cancer, plateau is felt to be indeterminate, and persistent enhancement is reported to be a feature most consistent with benignity. These features are not 100% accurate , and reported accuracies vary. This is particularly true in nonfocal mass enhancement in which persistent enhancement does not exclude malignancy. Similarly, classic fibroadenomas can demonstrate washout and this should not be used as evidence of malignancy. Use of MR imaging demonstrats additional foci of cancer that are mammographically occult in up to 40% of women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer.
Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths among women. Imaging plays a crucial role in all aspects of breast cancer care. This includes early detection through screening, diagnosis and associated image-guided biopsy, treatment planning, and follow-up.The limitations of x-ray mammography have led to extensive efforts to develop complimentary imaging techniques to improve breast imaging performance,particularly in the radiographically dense breast. The most accepted adjunct modality is breast sonography, which is now widely used in the diagnostic evaluation of women with abnormal screening mammography or clinical examination. Inspite of advances in other imaging modalities, Mammography remains a sensitive method for detecting early breast cancer, and it is also the most practical investigation for screening . Although general rules for differentiation between malignant and benign lesions exist, in clinical practice only 15%–30% of patients referred for biopsy are found to have a malignancy.The analysis of a mass seen on mammography is a complex process involving assessment of its size, shape, border characteristics,and density.Primary signs of malignant breast lesions on Mammography are density of mass which is more than the rest of breast,and outline of malignant mass which is speculated or irregular (caused due to infiltrative duct carcinoma and invasive lobular carcinoma also called as speculated carcinoma).Occassionally well defined smooth border mass( is caused due to medullary, colloid and papillary/intracystic carcinoma, and this entity is called as circumscribed carcinoma) may be seen. Mammographic size of mass is always less than the palpable mass. Microcalcifications are seen in upto 40% of cases of cancer and 20% of clustered microcalcifications represent malignancy. In addition to these signs other primary signs on mammography are architectural distortion, asymmetric density (distinct dense tumour mass seen with in the asymtric density) and segmental enlargement of the duct. On MR Imaging , the initial approach to enhancement of breast is to make a determination of whether the enhancement represents a focal mass or not a focal mass. In order to define which of these masses are malignant and which are benign, other architectural features can be utilized. An important feature is the shape and border of the lesion .The more irregular or spiculated the lesion margin is, the more likely it is to be cancer.Lesion borders that are smooth or demonstrate gentle lobulations are more likely to be benign. This distinction is still not 100% accurate. There are lobulated-bordered cancers; for example, colloid, tubular, and medullary cancers can have well-defined lobulated borders. In addition, benign lesions such as radial scars can demonstrate spiculation. Other features can be valuable in further distinguishing between benign and malignant enhancing focal masses. Rim enhancement of the lesion is highly suggestive of malignancy. Cystic lesions in the breast will typically have an enhancing rim. The smooth enhancing rim of a cystic lesion does not suggest any evidence of malignancy. It is seen that enhancing rims in solid lesions can occur not only at the periphery of the lesion, but occasionally can be seen entering the internal portion of a lesion.The finding of septations within a lobulated or smooth-bordered lesion should be considered as good evidence of benignity. References / Suggested Reading:
Fri, 05/29/2009 - 13:23
#2
MR is not used as a screening
MR is not used as a screening modality for breast cancer at our institution. |













This is a great write up on breast malignancy, especially the MR of breast ca. How often are breast MR s performed at your institution? Are there any strict criteria that you follow as to which patients should get an MR?
Shweta Bhatt, MD
Shweta Bhatt, MD
Assistant Professor Department of Radiology
Assistant Director of Ultrasound
University of Rochester, Rochester, NY